I read an article today (via Brent’s Town Crier) about why rural ministry isn’t considered cool.
This has always stumped me, particularly with regard to emergent church stuff. If small communities who aren’t playing the numbers game is where it’s at, if we’re interested in people who are closely tied to their local communities, their local stores and their local culture, why is emergent culture so tied to urban culture? If we’re supposed to be close to poverty and turn away from consumerism, fashion and stuff-ism, why do most emergents live in economic and consumeristic meccas?
Why is nobody talking about what it means to be an emergent person in a town smaller than 100,000, let alone a town of 5000, or of 200?
The reasons, I think, are only unfortunate:
- It’s dang hard to find some hippy counter-cultural types in Flora, IL. And if you can’t find somebody to agree with you, it’s hard to maintain any sort of attitude particularly if the core of that attitude is supposed to be loving people who aren’t like you.
- It’s just not cool to live in a corn and soybeans farming town, a town with plenty of white trash and no black gangs, with meth but no crack, with well-off farmers and a two-room library that primarily checks out mysteries and romances.
Living that kind of life is not sexy (in both the literal and the overly broad senses of the word) or artsy. To sum up: it’s just not that much fun.
Nobody’s talking about being emergent in a small American town because it’s hard and it’s not fun/cool. People like that are doing their best to get out of their small towns and to get to the cities where there’s art and coolness and coffeeshops and whatnot.
I’m not suggesting that the people doing emergent churches are only doing it because they want to be cool–I’m sure they’re doing the best they can with what they’ve got.
But I AM suggesting that there’s some sort of cultural lie here that needs deconstructing, one that says that if you care about poor people, you need to live in a city, that says if you’re interested in art, you had better live in a loft down the street from the gallery district.
That kind of lie marginalizes a lot of people, Christians and nonChristians alike, who live outside cultural centers, out in the middle of no where. I don’t know if I can get down with that.
2 Comments
Right on! I appreciate this critique a lot. You touched on something (rural life) I’m deeply interested in. My family roots are in rural Texas and Georgia. I have lived in a small city in Northern California, surrounded by mountain and agricultural communities, for most of my life. Chico, Calif. is sort of the in-between-zone with San Francisco to the West and places like Concow to the East. Anyway, there are answers to your questions (and I like the reasons you gave!)…but I’m not sure anyone is going to spend much time thinking about it. Money dictates a lot in this area, don’t you think?
outstanding observation… i mean really, i’m very happy to read your post
i am in a town of 26k in northern cali and we have a little semi-monastic community (or maybe semi-monastic-wanna-be) and it is HARD!
and you’re right… no one wants to do it… no want wants suburbia (maybe for better reasons) but no one wants rural or small town either… and if you really want to effect the heartbeat of your culture, START SMALL!
i think change is in the air… i think more and more, people around the fringes of emergence are picking out some of things that need to be judged… prophetically judged…
the hipster, “sexy” angle of emergent stuff is out of control and very few have been willing to call out the elephant in the room… i think that stage of denial may be coming to an end (have a look at peter rollins blog lately)
at any rate, well said and keep calling it out…
One Trackback
[…] I have shyed away from much of the emergent ‘conversation’ because of the fear of the hipsterness to it. I know I am not the only one with these reservations, as Jake has spoken about this before, here. […]