I’ll be the first to say that I’m a white male and that as such, it’s awful hard to make me feel like a minority. So please understand I mean this is in the most honest of ways:
What makes the marketing for Deadly Vipers offensive to Asians but the ad below not offensive to Russians (or is it offensive)?
Or for that matter, what makes Deadly vipers offensive, but Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles not offensive?
I know this can easily come out dismissive, like I’m making fun of the people who are taking offense.
I’m not. I’m on the outside looking in on this on and am trying to understand it. Where’s the line between using offensive stereotypes and appropriating a style? What’s at the root of the offense, ie. what makes Deadly Vipers (or any other similar use of a racial stereotype, Chief Illiniwek, for example) offensive?
Asking this question on my blog probably isn’t the most effective forum for this question–I’d be willing to wager that my regular readers are predominately white and male, the historical majority, and I’m mostly interested in the opinions, or more accurately, the feelings, of people who aren’t in that minority, the people who feel marginalized, and who find these things offensive.
What makes them offensive? And what’s the difference between someone using an offensive stereotype and some of those influences permeating and becoming influential parts of the larger culture? Or is the latter offensive somehow as well?
This is a pretty complex issue–I’m not necessarily interested in figuring out the ‘solution’ per se, as much as I am interested in what it is that makes people feel offended and why.
What Makes Stereotype Offensive?
and why do we people take offense?
A few days ago, Benson Hines posted about some hubaloo about a book (Deadly Vipers) being marketed with offensive Asian stereotypes, ninjas, Japanese gardens, etc.
I’ll be the first to say that I’m a white male and that as such, it’s awful hard to make me feel like a minority. So please understand I mean this is in the most honest of ways:
What makes the marketing for Deadly Vipers offensive to Asians but the ad below not offensive to Russians (or is it offensive)?
Or for that matter, what makes Deadly vipers offensive, but Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles not offensive?
I know this can easily come out dismissive, like I’m making fun of the people who are taking offense.
I’m not. I’m on the outside looking in on this on and am trying to understand it. Where’s the line between using offensive stereotypes and appropriating a style? What’s at the root of the offense, ie. what makes Deadly Vipers (or any other similar use of a racial stereotype, Chief Illiniwek, for example) offensive?
Asking this question on my blog probably isn’t the most effective forum for this question–I’d be willing to wager that my regular readers are predominately white and male, the historical majority, and I’m mostly interested in the opinions, or more accurately, the feelings, of people who aren’t in that minority, the people who feel marginalized, and who find these things offensive.
What makes them offensive? And what’s the difference between someone using an offensive stereotype and some of those influences permeating and becoming influential parts of the larger culture? Or is the latter offensive somehow as well?
This is a pretty complex issue–I’m not necessarily interested in figuring out the ‘solution’ per se, as much as I am interested in what it is that makes people feel offended and why.