The Inner Torment of Being A Linux User

or How Linux Is Like Protestantism

Ivanka from the Ubuntu Design Team twit­tered a hys­ter­i­cal link about the dif­fer­ence between Mac and PCs recently. It was an old arti­cle, from 1994 or some such, so they com­pared Mac to DOS, which is funny to start with. Of course, you can sub­sti­tute “Win­dows” or even bet­ter, “Linux,” for DOS in this context.

About mid­way through the arti­cle, it really hit its stride, com­par­ing the Mac/DOS debate to the Catholicism/Protestantism debate. Here’s the killer paragraph:

DOS is Protes­tant, or even Calvin­is­tic. It allows free inter­pre­ta­tion of scrip­ture, demands dif­fi­cult per­sonal deci­sions, imposes a sub­tle hermeneu­tics upon the user, and takes for granted the idea that not all can achieve sal­va­tion. To make the sys­tem work you need to inter­pret the pro­gram your­self: Far away from the baroque com­mu­nity of rev­el­ers, the user is closed within the lone­li­ness of his own inner torment.

Did I men­tion that last line about ‘lone­li­ness of his own inner tor­ment’ is sub­stan­tially fun­nier if you sub­sti­tute “Linux” for “DOS”?

This entry was posted in christianity, linux and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Derek
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Enter through the nar­row gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruc­tion, and many enter through it.” Matthew 7:13 NIV
    That verse came to mind when I read this.

  2. Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    really? Calvin­ist as “free­dom of inter­pre­ta­tion”? :)

  3. Posted May 12, 2010 at 2:18 am | Permalink

    I didn’t real­ize soft­ware could be so the­o­log­i­cal. Thanks for sharing!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>